Why Reducing Takeout Won’t Save Horse Racing

Thu March 17th 2011 | Categories: Industry Talk

Anyone interested in truly understanding the business dynamics, history, and opinions around takeouts (cost of wagering) in horse racing should read Alan F. Balch's blog, Pricing the Future, prior to reading this post.

The decision by the California authorities to raise the takeout on any type of wager, either a single race or multi-race wager, is probably the most misinformed and dangerous move possible. In the internet era where products from all markets are available and competing for the wagering dollar, there is no doubt the decision will reduce the appeal of the California product. It will reduce the amounts bet in California and ultimately reduce the takeout in absolute dollars.

Further, I agree that in horse racing like all other businesses, takeout or prices should be dictated not by regulatory bodies but by market demand. The internet has removed all geographic boundaries and created a true competitive environment, allowing the consumer to make buying decisions based on value, or more importantly perceived value. Each jurisdiction should be able to price their product based on its quality in order to maximize their revenues and profit in a true global market.

On the other hand, the argument that reducing takeout will fix our problems is also misinformed and dangerous. In all other businesses it is analogous to stating that reducing prices increases demand. This is simply not the case. In fact, pricing in a true competitive environment is set based on demand, driven by a need to maximize profit.

To understand the impact of changes in takeout, you must first understand the difference between takeout and the true return on investment (ROI) available to the consumer. At What Wins we calculate a monthly rolling ROI based on the Morning Line and a mix of exotic bets at all Canadian Standardbred tracks. While the average takeout is around 21%, the ROI is generally around -30%. What this means is that industry insiders and very knowledgeable gamblers are driving down the ROI available to the average consumer.

I wonder, if the takeout is reduced, how much of that reduction will actually reach the intended target market?

Photo Credit: U.S. National Archives

Posted by annewilts on Thu, March 17, 2011 at 10:46 AM

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

 

0 Comments so far

Click here to have your say and post a comment

 



Filling the Grandstands Again: Rescuing Horse Racing

Mon May 9th 2011

I recently read an interesting article… [read more]

What To Bet Your 1st Time

Wed April 20th 2011

We had a reply from someone on Twitter last week in response to this tweet of ours:

[read more]



Subscribe via email

Enter your email address:

Contact us

Email

Phone (613) 832-0755

Tags

artificial intelligence betting ROI betting tips Catie favourites first time at the track horse racing business jack darling Ontario Racing Commission picking winners purse distribution rideau carleton takeouts winning wagers

Popular Posts

What’s Your Betting Return on Investment? (2708 views)
Winning Bets at Rideau Carleton Raceway (1925 views)
Increase Your Profit at the Racetrack (1404 views)

Articles by Category

Industry Talk
Changing the Sport of Harness Racing for the Better
Filling the Grandstands Again: Rescuing Horse Racing
Reigniting Harness Racing in Ontario
Why Reducing Takeout Won't Save Horse Racing
Racing 101
What To Bet Your 1st Time
What's Your Betting Return on Investment?
The Winning Bet
Increase Your Profit at the Racetrack
Top Five Tips to Winning at the Racetrack
Winning Bets at Rideau Carleton Raceway

Blogroll

Horse Racing Business
http://www.horseracingbusiness.com/ Triple Dead Heat
http://www.tripledeadheat.ca/ Pull The Pocket
http://pullthepocket.blogspot.com/

Site Map | Terms and Conditions | Privacy

© 2012. What Wins Inc. All Rights Reserved

TERMS AND CONDITIONS (DISCLAIMERS) Products and/or services offered by What Wins Inc. are not to be intended to nor should they be construed as an inducement for anyone to gamble and should be used only as a means of entertainment. The services or products should not be used if prohibited by law and the user must be 18 years of age or older or of legal age in the area that they are being used. Under no circumstances shall What Wins Inc. be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, special, consequential, exemplary or other damages whatsoever (include, without limitation, lost profits, lost revenue, lost business, lost data, betting losses, replacement products or data, or other similar damages). For the full terms and conditions please refer to the What Wins Inc. Terms and Conditions.